Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-02 20:57:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Sir can I ask your point? Because this is not how CN works. The post is already correct. it doesn't need any notes https://help.x.com/en/using-x/community-notes

Written by 20E6A8B0C01002AE17905DAC35A1B532C44FC6D89ADF4C0A65ED56BC9C3B7089
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1874489865154498823

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1874923008415953402
  • noteId - 1874923008415953402
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 20E6A8B0C01002AE17905DAC35A1B532C44FC6D89ADF4C0A65ED56BC9C3B7089 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1735851454249
  • tweetId - 1874489865154498823
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Sir can I ask your point? Because this is not how CN works. The post is already correct. it doesn't need any notes https://help.x.com/en/using-x/community-notes

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-03 08:28:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-02 18:35:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-03 18:41:29 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-02 19:45:09 -0600 Rating Details