Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-02 07:08:49 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. Die Erklärung listet, neben dem eigentlichen Hack, lediglich weitere illegale Tätigkeiten auf. Somit ist die Argumentation auch hier, dass es illegal sei und deshalb sicher.

Written by F87DB1F9924D6FFF724DC4D99039E1970E16146544D2CD7B345CF343FF25A434
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1874554117424890287

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1874714447022875134
  • noteId - 1874714447022875134
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F87DB1F9924D6FFF724DC4D99039E1970E16146544D2CD7B345CF343FF25A434 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1735801729337
  • tweetId - 1874554117424890287
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. Die Erklärung listet, neben dem eigentlichen Hack, lediglich weitere illegale Tätigkeiten auf. Somit ist die Argumentation auch hier, dass es illegal sei und deshalb sicher.