Birdwatch Note
2025-01-01 22:47:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
このポストは能登半島地震への石川県の対応が、あたかも何もしていないだろうという元ポストへの反対意見であり、一例として内灘町(石川県)の道路の修復を挙げています。 写真の道路は令和6年能登半島地震での被災箇所(被災直後および応急復旧工事後)であるため適切な例示であることに留意が必要です。 内灘町 令和6年能登半島地震関連情報 https://www.town.uchinada.lg.jp/site/earthquake/list199-482.html
Written by E95429A3DD51B40A82A919D9096EE2672BD4F2E01E24813149FB15BAE8CE2387
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1873754234707214503
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1874588353221558360
- noteId - 1874588353221558360
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E95429A3DD51B40A82A919D9096EE2672BD4F2E01E24813149FB15BAE8CE2387 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735771666233
- tweetId - 1873754234707214503
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- このポストは能登半島地震への石川県の対応が、あたかも何もしていないだろうという元ポストへの反対意見であり、一例として内灘町(石川県)の道路の修復を挙げています。 写真の道路は令和6年能登半島地震での被災箇所(被災直後および応急復旧工事後)であるため適切な例示であることに留意が必要です。 内灘町 令和6年能登半島地震関連情報 https://www.town.uchinada.lg.jp/site/earthquake/list199-482.html
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-02 01:56:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 00:01:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 23:14:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 23:03:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 20:55:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 20:25:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 19:49:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 19:42:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 18:01:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 17:53:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 02:36:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 02:34:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 00:48:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 00:40:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 00:38:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 23:51:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 18:49:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 17:52:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 17:14:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 02:30:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 02:29:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 01:53:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 01:32:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 23:56:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 23:48:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 23:27:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 21:09:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 19:47:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 19:37:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 19:29:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 18:36:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 17:54:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 17:35:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 02:01:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 01:49:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 01:21:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 00:39:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-02 00:24:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 20:39:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 20:10:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 20:06:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 19:11:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 18:56:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 18:34:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 17:03:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-01 16:58:26 -0600 | Rating Details |