Birdwatch Note
2024-12-31 17:39:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Die Diskussion findet dennoch statt und ist deshalb unerheblich, ob es sich tatsächlich um ein KI-Bild handelt.
Written by E4188E9BC5AB2DCA05DCE74E4E59C86E23D32199ED462C886D182F8E27E30843
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1873501349322854679
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1874148311206170942
- noteId - 1874148311206170942
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E4188E9BC5AB2DCA05DCE74E4E59C86E23D32199ED462C886D182F8E27E30843 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735666752041
- tweetId - 1873501349322854679
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Die Diskussion findet dennoch statt und ist deshalb unerheblich, ob es sich tatsächlich um ein KI-Bild handelt.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-31 15:10:13 -0600 | Rating Details |