Birdwatch Note
2024-12-29 11:58:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
MDPI ist ein Publisher ohne adequates Review. https://predatoryjournals.org/news/f/fake-reviews-at-mdpi?blogcategory=MDPI Einordnung Gavin Schmidt: https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2022/09/a-ceres-of-fortunate-events/ Arbeit vom CERES-Team zur Attribution der Feedbacks: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021GL093047 Forcing fast ausschließlich im LW: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/174407/7/2020GL091585.pdf Wolken sind ein positives Feedback: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2026290118 https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/technical-summary/figure-ts-17/ Eine ASR response auf ein CO₂-Forcing ist erwartbar: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1412190111
Written by ADF6352474E19B292ADFC1069D172C42C9D8142CADE023B8B96113642CC5744E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1873126651929706641
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1873337828265886141
- noteId - 1873337828265886141
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - ADF6352474E19B292ADFC1069D172C42C9D8142CADE023B8B96113642CC5744E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735473517849
- tweetId - 1873126651929706641
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- MDPI ist ein Publisher ohne adequates Review. https://predatoryjournals.org/news/f/fake-reviews-at-mdpi?blogcategory=MDPI Einordnung Gavin Schmidt: https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2022/09/a-ceres-of-fortunate-events/ Arbeit vom CERES-Team zur Attribution der Feedbacks: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021GL093047 Forcing fast ausschließlich im LW: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/174407/7/2020GL091585.pdf Wolken sind ein positives Feedback: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2026290118 https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/technical-summary/figure-ts-17/ Eine ASR response auf ein CO₂-Forcing ist erwartbar: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1412190111
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-03 14:53:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 06:55:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-30 03:55:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 17:50:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 11:58:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 08:26:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 06:42:44 -0600 | Rating Details |