Birdwatch Note
2024-12-29 11:24:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Two recent studies, one in Science, confirm the tweet, probably the source of this tweet.
Written by DA3DE44C32D04298C14C9A3D761C762A050C8F3BF5C6702B96B5DD27CBCA5E66
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1872756702648611141
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1873329205842219437
- noteId - 1873329205842219437
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DA3DE44C32D04298C14C9A3D761C762A050C8F3BF5C6702B96B5DD27CBCA5E66 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735471462103
- tweetId - 1872756702648611141
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Two recent studies, one in Science, confirm the tweet, probably the source of this tweet.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-29 10:40:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 07:28:40 -0600 | Rating Details |