Birdwatch Note
2024-12-28 19:13:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - in The World Bank's Container Port Performance Index 2023, the highest ranked US port is Charleston, SC at number 53. The ranking is by performance, not by volume. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099060324114539683/pdf/P17583313892300871be641a5ea7b90e0e6.pdf https://www.wsj.com/opinion/how-bad-are-u-s-ports-the-best-is-53rd-worldwide-longshoreman-dockworker-2f1e9a87
Written by E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1873074436636852288
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1873084785792299466
- noteId - 1873084785792299466
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735413187823
- tweetId - 1873074436636852288
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - in The World Bank's Container Port Performance Index 2023, the highest ranked US port is Charleston, SC at number 53. The ranking is by performance, not by volume. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099060324114539683/pdf/P17583313892300871be641a5ea7b90e0e6.pdf https://www.wsj.com/opinion/how-bad-are-u-s-ports-the-best-is-53rd-worldwide-longshoreman-dockworker-2f1e9a87
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-29 14:06:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 07:00:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 05:31:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 01:49:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 22:13:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 22:08:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 21:34:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 18:49:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 18:43:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 15:42:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 15:03:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:46:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:16:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:56:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:43:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:42:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:38:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:33:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:32:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:26:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 16:55:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 13:54:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 00:47:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 20:18:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 20:17:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 20:04:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 15:37:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:45:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:39:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:49:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 12:38:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 12:21:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 04:46:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 23:33:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 21:37:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 19:59:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 16:01:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:48:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:22:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:16:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:14:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:42:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:37:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:29:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:20:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:18:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 15:03:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 14:55:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 11:17:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 11:02:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 09:53:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 09:47:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 08:20:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 04:39:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 04:18:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-29 03:34:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 21:15:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 19:00:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 18:53:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 18:43:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 17:49:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 16:18:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 15:06:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:32:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 14:07:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 13:30:54 -0600 | Rating Details |