Birdwatch Note
2024-12-28 04:27:44 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The current note, which is being shown to users on X, does not refute anything in the original post. While it adds some context, it is argumentative and misses the point: that there was a vehicle for cancer research outside of the House’s now-defunct omnibus.
Written by F39770FC3EC435542B7983D232CE7E1D8A883545890C498370B9D8FFCAB3CA08
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1870290271381917823
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1872861971495653542
- noteId - 1872861971495653542
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F39770FC3EC435542B7983D232CE7E1D8A883545890C498370B9D8FFCAB3CA08 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735360064754
- tweetId - 1870290271381917823
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The current note, which is being shown to users on X, does not refute anything in the original post. While it adds some context, it is argumentative and misses the point: that there was a vehicle for cancer research outside of the House’s now-defunct omnibus.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-29 07:59:53 -0600 | Rating Details |