Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-28 01:15:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

OP is presenting an opinion. Unless there’s clear evidence, this does not warrant a CN (and even if there is, tweet should be reported; CN is not for TOS violations).

Written by 120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1872718699733680511

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1872813496158527907
  • noteId - 1872813496158527907
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1735348507333
  • tweetId - 1872718699733680511
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • OP is presenting an opinion. Unless there’s clear evidence, this does not warrant a CN (and even if there is, tweet should be reported; CN is not for TOS violations).