Birdwatch Note
2024-12-27 23:00:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is what’s known as an appeal to authority. Regardless of one’s view of the subject at hand this does not count as “evidence” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Written by 37C563411CD8C3F8ADB83720D6A1E7B7477E17598994AF0BA14F53A217936988
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1872704102108713051
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1872779563383525721
- noteId - 1872779563383525721
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 37C563411CD8C3F8ADB83720D6A1E7B7477E17598994AF0BA14F53A217936988 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735340417129
- tweetId - 1872704102108713051
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is what’s known as an appeal to authority. Regardless of one’s view of the subject at hand this does not count as “evidence” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-27 20:07:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-27 17:15:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-27 17:08:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-30 07:58:43 -0600 | Rating Details |