Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-26 18:33:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - HJS is not a reliable source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Jackson_Society#Criticism

Written by 7C4CCE69D6291C5704EC25E4934117DAF591E77FD0757114956CAD8CBCF66928
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1872276346212417676

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1872350127350030620
  • noteId - 1872350127350030620
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7C4CCE69D6291C5704EC25E4934117DAF591E77FD0757114956CAD8CBCF66928 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1735238031600
  • tweetId - 1872276346212417676
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - HJS is not a reliable source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Jackson_Society#Criticism

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-26 13:01:12 -0600 Rating Details