Birdwatch Note
2024-12-25 22:36:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I see no reason why one mistake on this list warrants a community note, considering 25 vs 26 years is insignificant and everything else is correct. The poster is simply making a point how much has changed over the years. Why remove his ad revenue?
Written by F1B52A905EDB9C2577194E53B7D8E77F54138E956D615236B72F26BA40C199AC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1871957407007748370
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1872048833263493192
- noteId - 1872048833263493192
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F1B52A905EDB9C2577194E53B7D8E77F54138E956D615236B72F26BA40C199AC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735166197493
- tweetId - 1871957407007748370
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- I see no reason why one mistake on this list warrants a community note, considering 25 vs 26 years is insignificant and everything else is correct. The poster is simply making a point how much has changed over the years. Why remove his ad revenue?
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-25 16:47:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-26 20:26:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-08 18:09:07 -0600 | Rating Details |