Birdwatch Note
2024-12-23 18:38:29 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
本投稿は事実を述べており、事実誤認は含んでいないためノートは必要ありません ノートで、マスコミや法的専門家が民事訴訟の「被告」と刑事訴訟の「被告人」を意識的に使い分けていることを述べていますが、本投稿及び引用の中でも「被告」と述べており間違っていません
Written by 96607B04B69364D61ABCAB71AE5B09B743616D959BBFE6C852B06D94F43546C2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1871039955281363282
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1871264131111866483
- noteId - 1871264131111866483
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 96607B04B69364D61ABCAB71AE5B09B743616D959BBFE6C852B06D94F43546C2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1734979109921
- tweetId - 1871039955281363282
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- 本投稿は事実を述べており、事実誤認は含んでいないためノートは必要ありません ノートで、マスコミや法的専門家が民事訴訟の「被告」と刑事訴訟の「被告人」を意識的に使い分けていることを述べていますが、本投稿及び引用の中でも「被告」と述べており間違っていません
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-23 23:02:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-23 17:30:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-23 16:37:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-23 16:37:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-23 16:08:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-23 15:27:40 -0600 | Rating Details |