Birdwatch Note
2024-12-20 11:49:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
ポスト元は皇后でない他の皇族を揶揄している書き込みですが、写真はご成婚当時の雅子皇后です。 https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20220101_1716559.html?DETAIL
Written by BD7560E8BB8CF524625D4644EB07AEFBCD04F64FC6E0F4F2BAF91FA3458ED555
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1869246387541664032
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1870074090234753295
- noteId - 1870074090234753295
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BD7560E8BB8CF524625D4644EB07AEFBCD04F64FC6E0F4F2BAF91FA3458ED555 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1734695382066
- tweetId - 1869246387541664032
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- ポスト元は皇后でない他の皇族を揶揄している書き込みですが、写真はご成婚当時の雅子皇后です。 https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20220101_1716559.html?DETAIL
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-20 08:53:18 -0600 | Rating Details |