Birdwatch Note
2024-12-19 14:26:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
5G is ~32% of wireless cellular. Based on current scientific evidence, 5G technology is deemed safe, and there is no established need for EMF shielding blankets to protect against 5G exposure. Stay informed through reputable sources: https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.5gamericas.org/5g-and-health/ https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-risks-safety/radiation/everyday-things-emit-radiation/cell-phones-towers.html https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6 EMR Spectrum: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phones.html 5G is Safe: https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-5g-mobile-networks-and-health https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806221/ https://www.5gamericas.org/global-5g-connections-reaches-nearly-two-billion/
Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1869742240991519156
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1869751250381570191
- noteId - 1869751250381570191
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1734618411046
- tweetId - 1869742240991519156
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 5G is ~32% of wireless cellular. Based on current scientific evidence, 5G technology is deemed safe, and there is no established need for EMF shielding blankets to protect against 5G exposure. Stay informed through reputable sources: https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.5gamericas.org/5g-and-health/ https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-risks-safety/radiation/everyday-things-emit-radiation/cell-phones-towers.html https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6 EMR Spectrum: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phones.html 5G is Safe: https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-5g-mobile-networks-and-health https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806221/ https://www.5gamericas.org/global-5g-connections-reaches-nearly-two-billion/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-19 21:30:20 -0500 | Rating Details |