Birdwatch Note
2024-12-18 09:32:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The date can be easily seen in the photo, and the post itself is factually correct, even though old.
Written by 6B1055C1400536C5BA638AE7BE485275439B8D5A06B4C4161D98DFD48000B423
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1868708027681112110
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1869314837764776386
- noteId - 1869314837764776386
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6B1055C1400536C5BA638AE7BE485275439B8D5A06B4C4161D98DFD48000B423 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1734514362170
- tweetId - 1868708027681112110
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The date can be easily seen in the photo, and the post itself is factually correct, even though old.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-18 17:41:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 10:51:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 08:33:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 08:03:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 11:20:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 10:41:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 07:50:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-18 07:25:42 -0600 | Rating Details |