Birdwatch Note
2024-12-17 20:25:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Presseverlautbarungen der Institution(en), die im Post kritisiert wird/werden sind regelmässig keine vertrauenswürdigen und zuverlässige Quelle für Kollektive Anmerkungen.
Written by 549364A621586488DE8BB0D785A6FAE9D1E9AF921B61FB858B71335D1F452F77
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1868916598439813476
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1869116782763499592
- noteId - 1869116782763499592
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 549364A621586488DE8BB0D785A6FAE9D1E9AF921B61FB858B71335D1F452F77 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1734467142178
- tweetId - 1868916598439813476
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Presseverlautbarungen der Institution(en), die im Post kritisiert wird/werden sind regelmässig keine vertrauenswürdigen und zuverlässige Quelle für Kollektive Anmerkungen.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-17 15:14:43 -0600 | Rating Details |