Birdwatch Note
2024-12-17 12:25:47 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The proposed CN is either deliberately seeking to offend or is pedantic to the point of being obtuse. Either way the CN is entirely unnecessary and should be removed.
Written by 19BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1868759386380025998
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1868996007742062771
- noteId - 1868996007742062771
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 19BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1734438347169
- tweetId - 1868759386380025998
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The proposed CN is either deliberately seeking to offend or is pedantic to the point of being obtuse. Either way the CN is entirely unnecessary and should be removed.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-17 07:24:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-17 06:47:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-17 06:45:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-17 06:44:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-17 06:32:25 -0600 | Rating Details |