Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-15 21:35:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN- while I disagree with the OP, the tweet is presented as their own personal subjective viewpoint, following the prompt asking for opinions, not a statement of fact

Written by C37660B2337DE676258CA5FF847A220243E3D22EF79D05B47070D65B20140B8B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1867427732185133266

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1868409537449119779
  • noteId - 1868409537449119779
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C37660B2337DE676258CA5FF847A220243E3D22EF79D05B47070D65B20140B8B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1734298521755
  • tweetId - 1867427732185133266
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN- while I disagree with the OP, the tweet is presented as their own personal subjective viewpoint, following the prompt asking for opinions, not a statement of fact

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-17 00:17:57 -0600 Rating Details