Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-13 00:12:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The note is factually correct. There are widely diverging opinions about the adequacy of the safeguards. Take your opinions to the comments.

Written by 103BC4A0E04F438FCFFFB3D751F1E0A67F0BAB53AF2CCE7144D87A0D00BBA36F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1867141311825895676

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1867361863907848331
  • noteId - 1867361863907848331
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 103BC4A0E04F438FCFFFB3D751F1E0A67F0BAB53AF2CCE7144D87A0D00BBA36F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1734048736918
  • tweetId - 1867141311825895676
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The note is factually correct. There are widely diverging opinions about the adequacy of the safeguards. Take your opinions to the comments.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-12 20:38:48 -0600 Rating Details