Birdwatch Note
2024-12-11 02:15:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The post incorrectly conflates geoengineering with the “chemtrails” conspiracy theory and falsely claims UN endorsement. Geoengineering is a theoretical proposal that is still in its early stages: https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/18/1089879/harvard-halts-its-long-planned-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiment/ https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory https://www.aerosociety.com/news/chemtrails-debunked/ https://news.uci.edu/2016/08/12/surveyed-scientists-debunk-chemtrails-conspiracy-theory/ It would not resemble “chemtrails” if implemented: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/04/20/fact-check-false-claim-video-shows-ongoing-geoengineering/11687577002/ Chemtrail Nonsense: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-environment/trail-chemtrail-nonsense
Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1866660428195008685
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1866668112663155038
- noteId - 1866668112663155038
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733883333733
- tweetId - 1866660428195008685
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The post incorrectly conflates geoengineering with the “chemtrails” conspiracy theory and falsely claims UN endorsement. Geoengineering is a theoretical proposal that is still in its early stages: https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/18/1089879/harvard-halts-its-long-planned-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiment/ https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory https://www.aerosociety.com/news/chemtrails-debunked/ https://news.uci.edu/2016/08/12/surveyed-scientists-debunk-chemtrails-conspiracy-theory/ It would not resemble “chemtrails” if implemented: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/04/20/fact-check-false-claim-video-shows-ongoing-geoengineering/11687577002/ Chemtrail Nonsense: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-environment/trail-chemtrail-nonsense
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-12 03:50:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-11 04:53:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 23:50:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 22:15:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 21:40:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 21:16:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 21:15:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 21:04:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 21:03:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 21:00:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:54:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:50:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:38:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:38:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:37:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:32:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:29:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:26:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:25:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:19:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-10 20:19:36 -0600 | Rating Details |