Birdwatch Note
2024-12-09 17:11:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The fight was cancelled if he didn't fight 2 on 1. He didn't have to. He just wouldn't have been paid
Written by 9D6B1C705BD052F9F69154C57DE123166FEA5028CDDE9EA99799C888972D1E6B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1865810432612585874
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1866168747821588911
- noteId - 1866168747821588911
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9D6B1C705BD052F9F69154C57DE123166FEA5028CDDE9EA99799C888972D1E6B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733764275876
- tweetId - 1865810432612585874
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The fight was cancelled if he didn't fight 2 on 1. He didn't have to. He just wouldn't have been paid
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-09 17:50:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-09 15:57:46 -0600 | Rating Details |