Birdwatch Note
2024-12-09 03:25:02 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The proposed CN offers no evidence that the entire video is "AI generated." Perhaps only some aspects were enhanced with AI tools. The link accompanying the CN is irrelevant. If the CN author does believe that TOS were violated then they can complain to X, not complain in a CN.
Written by 8B60B038795B75D2818855DDF79540FA0485DFAD7DCE6F387FB2A94B728D55F9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1865879856438751298
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1865960820942733492
- noteId - 1865960820942733492
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8B60B038795B75D2818855DDF79540FA0485DFAD7DCE6F387FB2A94B728D55F9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733714702245
- tweetId - 1865879856438751298
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The proposed CN offers no evidence that the entire video is "AI generated." Perhaps only some aspects were enhanced with AI tools. The link accompanying the CN is irrelevant. If the CN author does believe that TOS were violated then they can complain to X, not complain in a CN.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-12-08 23:22:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-08 21:41:47 -0600 | Rating Details |