Birdwatch Note
2024-12-07 03:34:46 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
False. Court was NOT definitive & did NOT say there was a Ram Mandir ruin below Babri Masjid. Relevant part: "On a preponderance of probabilities, archaeological findings... indicate it to be of Hindu religious origin dating to 12th c AD" P. Analysis on title P.1 I.iii pg 905 https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2010/36350/36350_2010_1_1502_18205_Judgement_09-Nov-2019.pdf
Written by B615626EC757FF74A9C335FF03B5E142707B52279A4D659FC24FBA53727B84F8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1864895593841332510
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1865238497411649669
- noteId - 1865238497411649669
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B615626EC757FF74A9C335FF03B5E142707B52279A4D659FC24FBA53727B84F8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733542486895
- tweetId - 1864895593841332510
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- False. Court was NOT definitive & did NOT say there was a Ram Mandir ruin below Babri Masjid. Relevant part: "On a preponderance of probabilities, archaeological findings... indicate it to be of Hindu religious origin dating to 12th c AD" P. Analysis on title P.1 I.iii pg 905 https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2010/36350/36350_2010_1_1502_18205_Judgement_09-Nov-2019.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-07 05:07:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-06 23:41:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-06 23:19:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-06 22:02:22 -0600 | Rating Details |