Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-06 20:37:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

It clearly suggests more research is needed but implies that caffeine might be detrimental.

Written by 07F98EE19ACBA5A48D2006FE33C36C213B320C15A9BD939D93F01F6C27CAD8A3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1864595618653413588

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1865133531980271824
  • noteId - 1865133531980271824
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 07F98EE19ACBA5A48D2006FE33C36C213B320C15A9BD939D93F01F6C27CAD8A3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1733517461186
  • tweetId - 1864595618653413588
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • It clearly suggests more research is needed but implies that caffeine might be detrimental.