Birdwatch Note
2024-12-05 01:12:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Mensonge ! Squeezie avait aussi reçu des critiques par certains. https://x.com/Landy_696/status/1864409905416810720 https://x.com/BFMTV/status/1595663878746251264 https://x.com/BFMTV/status/1595436413134295041 https://x.com/viewsfrance/status/1595727228452884480
Written by CA3A5BF65DCA87A745F747523F9FC47FC8314A049C1A132C0681E130487983A3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1864210703294382174
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1864478033563857029
- noteId - 1864478033563857029
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CA3A5BF65DCA87A745F747523F9FC47FC8314A049C1A132C0681E130487983A3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733361178185
- tweetId - 1864210703294382174
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Mensonge ! Squeezie avait aussi reçu des critiques par certains. https://x.com/Landy_696/status/1864409905416810720 https://x.com/BFMTV/status/1595663878746251264 https://x.com/BFMTV/status/1595436413134295041 https://x.com/viewsfrance/status/1595727228452884480
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-04 19:36:43 -0600 | Rating Details |