Birdwatch Note
2024-12-04 23:56:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN statement is actually correct Comments should be made in response to original post.
Written by 13B483788536F82C055758C98B653F29FC89F646FD472A2975581B4DFDAC9C70
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1864127745464381944
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1864458774481916250
- noteId - 1864458774481916250
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 13B483788536F82C055758C98B653F29FC89F646FD472A2975581B4DFDAC9C70 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733356586462
- tweetId - 1864127745464381944
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN statement is actually correct Comments should be made in response to original post.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-05 05:59:57 -0600 | Rating Details |