Birdwatch Note
2024-12-04 00:50:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Bovaer is not “harmful” to humans https://www.food.gov.uk/print/pdf/node/17091
Written by D700F653D3F222E51B943E83F0B0AE6C4993B714E3AC5AF0F2CEAE868B1A29A0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1863683661813440690
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1864109934096318823
- noteId - 1864109934096318823
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D700F653D3F222E51B943E83F0B0AE6C4993B714E3AC5AF0F2CEAE868B1A29A0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733273416433
- tweetId - 1863683661813440690
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Bovaer is not “harmful” to humans https://www.food.gov.uk/print/pdf/node/17091
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-04 07:53:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-04 00:51:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-03 18:55:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-03 21:43:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-03 19:24:03 -0600 | Rating Details |