Birdwatch Note
2024-12-03 23:38:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. 1. The proposed note should be on the quoted tweet. 2. The headline says “at least in this one cost-cutting area,” which is a reference to the article’s content, which users can read to get the full context.
Written by AF9B122123AA35776328BB8424CF3C9F93D6C597BAC393B927A39FFB794D9E42
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1863383648831172905
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1864091958748283175
- noteId - 1864091958748283175
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - AF9B122123AA35776328BB8424CF3C9F93D6C597BAC393B927A39FFB794D9E42 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733269130776
- tweetId - 1863383648831172905
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. 1. The proposed note should be on the quoted tweet. 2. The headline says “at least in this one cost-cutting area,” which is a reference to the article’s content, which users can read to get the full context.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-03 23:45:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-03 18:41:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-06 13:01:53 -0600 | Rating Details |