Birdwatch Note
2024-12-02 19:56:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The guy claiming the post isn't misleading because it's satire obviously doesn't know what satire is, because this post isn't satirising anything. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire
Written by DAC483C5AEE79933D746FF677664E0A854C06E67FAD414F56DA73DB3C47FAFC9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1863058674559689103
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1863673582162686317
- noteId - 1863673582162686317
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DAC483C5AEE79933D746FF677664E0A854C06E67FAD414F56DA73DB3C47FAFC9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1733169382025
- tweetId - 1863058674559689103
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The guy claiming the post isn't misleading because it's satire obviously doesn't know what satire is, because this post isn't satirising anything. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-02 17:08:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-02 16:55:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-02 15:34:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-02 15:13:13 -0600 | Rating Details |