Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-28 16:55:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Clearly false. There is no ipso facto (viz. "automatic") disqualification of a duly elected president. The Supreme Court instead held in Trump v. Anderson that disqualification may extend to *candidates* for federal office but would require prior congressional legislation. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf

Written by 5A6C7B5D9679186980B338862A743398083962C6B33A541242AB405D0AB8A7BF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861014297125544398

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1862178592873992369
  • noteId - 1862178592873992369
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5A6C7B5D9679186980B338862A743398083962C6B33A541242AB405D0AB8A7BF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1732812948804
  • tweetId - 1861014297125544398
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Clearly false. There is no ipso facto (viz. "automatic") disqualification of a duly elected president. The Supreme Court instead held in Trump v. Anderson that disqualification may extend to *candidates* for federal office but would require prior congressional legislation. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-29 10:53:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-28 10:56:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-01 17:47:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-30 05:17:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-03 18:37:50 -0600 Rating Details