Birdwatch Note
2024-11-28 13:33:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Claiming 5G produces significantly more harmful radiation than LTE lacks substantial scientific backing. Switching from 5G to LTE based on radiation concerns isn't necessary. 5G vs. LTE Radiation: https://ehtrust.org/new-study-finds-higher-radiation-exposures-from-5g-phones/#:~:text=Synthetically%2C%20our%20results%20showed%20that,human%20health%20and%20safety%20levels. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/11/5/113 Health Impact Studies: https://news.oregonstate.edu/news/5g-wireless-networks-have-few-health-impacts-oregon-state-study-using-zebrafish-model-finds https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7794711/ Regulatory Standards: https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/white-papers/accurately-assessing-exposure-to-radio-frequency-electromagnetic-fields-from-5g-networks https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2020/06/11/5g-radiation-levels-9-comparables-from-everyday-life/ 5G is safe: https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe
Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1862062021484986398
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1862127687470293375
- noteId - 1862127687470293375
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732800812009
- tweetId - 1862062021484986398
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Claiming 5G produces significantly more harmful radiation than LTE lacks substantial scientific backing. Switching from 5G to LTE based on radiation concerns isn't necessary. 5G vs. LTE Radiation: https://ehtrust.org/new-study-finds-higher-radiation-exposures-from-5g-phones/#:~:text=Synthetically%2C%20our%20results%20showed%20that,human%20health%20and%20safety%20levels. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/11/5/113 Health Impact Studies: https://news.oregonstate.edu/news/5g-wireless-networks-have-few-health-impacts-oregon-state-study-using-zebrafish-model-finds https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7794711/ Regulatory Standards: https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/white-papers/accurately-assessing-exposure-to-radio-frequency-electromagnetic-fields-from-5g-networks https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2020/06/11/5g-radiation-levels-9-comparables-from-everyday-life/ 5G is safe: https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-30 10:15:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 12:56:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 12:26:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 10:58:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 10:19:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 10:18:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 09:53:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 09:36:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 08:28:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 11:48:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 10:03:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 08:23:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 13:44:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 07:46:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 07:43:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 17:59:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 13:20:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 12:40:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 09:37:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 09:28:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 08:16:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 07:58:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 07:50:16 -0600 | Rating Details |