Birdwatch Note
2024-11-28 05:06:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article in question was not written by Hegseth. He was the publisher, not the author. Mr. Legum presents the article as evidence of Hegseth's opinions on rape. See p 9 of the article. https://t.co/0ytjKY6Gyp
Written by 1DF3A096B534EBDDB1635A7520C791584D7754C4164C5C1313FFE4F829AFEF1F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1858490026817946097
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1861999997387993307
- noteId - 1861999997387993307
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1DF3A096B534EBDDB1635A7520C791584D7754C4164C5C1313FFE4F829AFEF1F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732770368322
- tweetId - 1858490026817946097
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article in question was not written by Hegseth. He was the publisher, not the author. Mr. Legum presents the article as evidence of Hegseth's opinions on rape. See p 9 of the article. https://t.co/0ytjKY6Gyp
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-28 06:30:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 08:46:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 13:02:03 -0600 | Rating Details |