Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-27 20:09:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN all the proposed CNs are opinions or challe ginger the OP perspective. They belong in the replies not as a CN, stop abusing this function

Written by 1878143E2E1DC201D138636C5C1D48DB4D5336F58AFAE56BDBE71273B7CF30FB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861769430440558614

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1861864910654935149
  • noteId - 1861864910654935149
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1878143E2E1DC201D138636C5C1D48DB4D5336F58AFAE56BDBE71273B7CF30FB Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1732738161135
  • tweetId - 1861769430440558614
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN all the proposed CNs are opinions or challe ginger the OP perspective. They belong in the replies not as a CN, stop abusing this function

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-27 15:19:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-28 04:11:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-27 14:18:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-28 02:02:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-27 21:15:44 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-07 05:55:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-27 14:36:06 -0600 Rating Details