Birdwatch Note
2024-11-27 09:27:24 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. La note est inutile sur ce post. De plus, le post cité en note date de 2024, tandis que cette remarque existe depuis des années sur les réseaux. exemple de 2021 : https://x.com/_houc/status/1463212534790594570?s=46&t=TD9-fqQs-GSbvApgFhbxRA
Written by AE79B9B901E4F9BA6C505096CBF55D306D7DC3FD997EFA39089350343ADFE8EC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861463130129207603
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1861703358702055468
- noteId - 1861703358702055468
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - AE79B9B901E4F9BA6C505096CBF55D306D7DC3FD997EFA39089350343ADFE8EC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732699644147
- tweetId - 1861463130129207603
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. La note est inutile sur ce post. De plus, le post cité en note date de 2024, tandis que cette remarque existe depuis des années sur les réseaux. exemple de 2021 : https://x.com/_houc/status/1463212534790594570?s=46&t=TD9-fqQs-GSbvApgFhbxRA
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-27 09:21:04 -0600 | Rating Details |