Birdwatch Note
2024-11-27 05:29:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The scene differs from the first-hand account substantially enough that OP's post is well within the realm of credible speculation.
Written by 4888993AB980A8D14F88E643239D9C9DC674834ABB01826BCA5BEE7B7082BDBF
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861287806049354151
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1861643557536153915
- noteId - 1861643557536153915
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4888993AB980A8D14F88E643239D9C9DC674834ABB01826BCA5BEE7B7082BDBF Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732685386438
- tweetId - 1861287806049354151
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The scene differs from the first-hand account substantially enough that OP's post is well within the realm of credible speculation.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-02 07:16:14 -0600 | Rating Details |