Birdwatch Note
2024-11-24 12:06:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - the tweet is a fair précis of the linked article, which itself appear to be just an opinion piece. Argue with its conclusions in the replies.
Written by 6708448CAA6C43ABA5B5F4BCF26AE382905B61738D861EC09703FFC1BCBA20A3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1860374379562946964
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1860656192181440883
- noteId - 1860656192181440883
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6708448CAA6C43ABA5B5F4BCF26AE382905B61738D861EC09703FFC1BCBA20A3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732449980194
- tweetId - 1860374379562946964
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - the tweet is a fair précis of the linked article, which itself appear to be just an opinion piece. Argue with its conclusions in the replies.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-24 07:42:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-24 07:26:25 -0600 | Rating Details |