Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-23 02:49:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It quite literally is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childbirth

Written by A4C9862A8E4D41E27A8DD960E8B68A672A1FEB180F15CBE43C8EB42FC61CF6AD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1859957606015734148

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1860153695155159236
  • noteId - 1860153695155159236
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A4C9862A8E4D41E27A8DD960E8B68A672A1FEB180F15CBE43C8EB42FC61CF6AD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1732330175566
  • tweetId - 1859957606015734148
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It quite literally is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childbirth

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-22 21:06:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-23 16:01:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-22 22:36:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-22 22:15:33 -0600 Rating Details