Birdwatch Note
2024-11-20 23:24:33 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - I'm convinced the CNs pointing out the ad is in itself an ad as they are more prominent than any supposed 'ad' in the tweets. Also, an ad can't be an ad if it's hidden.
Written by 811A96FD9A5107EBCD2D4EE2FB65A0E8429806D04811897BB0812F1B5D75AB24
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1859187192377102420
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1859377322400317445
- noteId - 1859377322400317445
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 811A96FD9A5107EBCD2D4EE2FB65A0E8429806D04811897BB0812F1B5D75AB24 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732145073878
- tweetId - 1859187192377102420
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - I'm convinced the CNs pointing out the ad is in itself an ad as they are more prominent than any supposed 'ad' in the tweets. Also, an ad can't be an ad if it's hidden.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-20 17:28:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-21 02:22:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-20 20:17:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-21 03:59:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-20 23:04:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-21 03:26:47 -0600 | Rating Details |