Birdwatch Note
2024-11-19 04:13:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Missing context: the review found no effect on IQ in the high quality studies. “The inverse association between fluoride exposure and IQ was particularly strong in the studies at high risk of bias, while no adverse effect emerged in the only study judged at low risk of bias” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123000312
Written by 30CDECBB465F8707FF1828505520A6F029F7CA505B42BD81F065D5BC8671EDD7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1858580642700866039
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1858725369559609720
- noteId - 1858725369559609720
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 30CDECBB465F8707FF1828505520A6F029F7CA505B42BD81F065D5BC8671EDD7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731989636207
- tweetId - 1858580642700866039
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Missing context: the review found no effect on IQ in the high quality studies. “The inverse association between fluoride exposure and IQ was particularly strong in the studies at high risk of bias, while no adverse effect emerged in the only study judged at low risk of bias” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123000312
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-20 12:34:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-20 10:23:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-20 09:44:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 19:43:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 13:33:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 11:55:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 10:53:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 09:55:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 09:10:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 08:30:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 07:34:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 06:47:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 06:35:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 06:30:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 06:15:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 05:54:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 01:11:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 00:55:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-21 22:59:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 03:54:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-20 05:08:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 20:18:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 18:45:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 11:44:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 09:34:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 09:12:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 08:19:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 04:32:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 03:27:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 12:24:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 11:46:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 11:32:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 09:40:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 07:28:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 03:03:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 02:34:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 01:41:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-18 22:16:55 -0600 | Rating Details |