Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-18 05:03:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN Ah, ah, ah. They didn't POST the undisclosed ad. Completely different thing... original post already has one, so one is not needed here

Written by 94437D389B326B2B40322E946ECE2A55745335021919DA7DFBB4EF8C673A1CB4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857976681471893548

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1858375487313133870
  • noteId - 1858375487313133870
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 94437D389B326B2B40322E946ECE2A55745335021919DA7DFBB4EF8C673A1CB4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1731906217779
  • tweetId - 1857976681471893548
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN Ah, ah, ah. They didn't POST the undisclosed ad. Completely different thing... original post already has one, so one is not needed here

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-17 23:52:58 -0600 Rating Details