Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-17 23:09:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Note Needed: If the joke is just racism against a bystander, then it should at least be historically accurate https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgwve4j176o

Written by 6AC4522EA2ED0744E7BA81642C347B465D71EDFFD4F47308107128848F4007E5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857116673460834466

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1858286283090432166
  • noteId - 1858286283090432166
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6AC4522EA2ED0744E7BA81642C347B465D71EDFFD4F47308107128848F4007E5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1731884949835
  • tweetId - 1857116673460834466
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Note Needed: If the joke is just racism against a bystander, then it should at least be historically accurate https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgwve4j176o

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-18 04:22:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-18 02:26:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 23:25:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 23:24:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 17:16:47 -0600 Rating Details