Birdwatch Note
2024-11-17 20:23:49 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
To the NNN, that would still mean OP is wrongfully posing an unsubstantiated claim as fact. Context is clearly needed.
Written by 785FB845579C8FE36AD20ABC73082B6CB751A65D53222D8B7726C297F2619FD6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857568551315361979
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1858244673770340409
- noteId - 1858244673770340409
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 785FB845579C8FE36AD20ABC73082B6CB751A65D53222D8B7726C297F2619FD6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731875029401
- tweetId - 1857568551315361979
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- To the NNN, that would still mean OP is wrongfully posing an unsubstantiated claim as fact. Context is clearly needed.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-18 13:03:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-17 18:09:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-17 17:37:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-18 07:29:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-17 16:08:05 -0600 | Rating Details |