Birdwatch Note
2024-11-17 01:01:13 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The post is expressing an opinion on the political efficacy of these lobby groups, not accusing them of being partisan or supporting the carbon tax. If you have a different opinion, take it to the replies.
Written by BBDB53C5823B9CFDD55C56EF25DFE17B256EBCBADC2524F8A837E8301B706BBF
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857932458576007245
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1857952094923198796
- noteId - 1857952094923198796
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BBDB53C5823B9CFDD55C56EF25DFE17B256EBCBADC2524F8A837E8301B706BBF Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731805273168
- tweetId - 1857932458576007245
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The post is expressing an opinion on the political efficacy of these lobby groups, not accusing them of being partisan or supporting the carbon tax. If you have a different opinion, take it to the replies.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-17 14:19:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 23:55:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 22:00:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 20:16:06 -0600 | Rating Details |