Birdwatch Note
2024-11-16 10:07:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The other note is pure speculation. The original post is an opinion and a recommendation. No note needed
Written by 5093565BAB9DB5D14C8EC81B1BEE52F98D3D9F4CC12302A5C134B030F9B9AA4C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857179053553226195
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1857727117296837085
- noteId - 1857727117296837085
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5093565BAB9DB5D14C8EC81B1BEE52F98D3D9F4CC12302A5C134B030F9B9AA4C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731751634321
- tweetId - 1857179053553226195
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The other note is pure speculation. The original post is an opinion and a recommendation. No note needed
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-16 08:24:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 05:56:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 05:24:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 05:08:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-18 11:32:18 -0600 | Rating Details |