Birdwatch Note
2024-11-15 12:05:13 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The notes own sources show the OP is correct. The note author is trying to argue semantics.
Written by 309872892B7B7C5B48C22ECAA602414AA08954DC8616FFCB2F2F17C831A9A0CD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857180305204920624
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1857394423148978256
- noteId - 1857394423148978256
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 309872892B7B7C5B48C22ECAA602414AA08954DC8616FFCB2F2F17C831A9A0CD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731672313855
- tweetId - 1857180305204920624
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The notes own sources show the OP is correct. The note author is trying to argue semantics.