Birdwatch Note
2024-11-15 09:00:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
ワクチンの効果が疑わしいとの事ですが、ワクチンの効果は下記にWHOにまとめられたようにオミクロン期の数百もの研究で確認されてきた知見です https://view-hub.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/COVID19%20VE%20Studies_Forest%20Plots_Omicron.pdf 打てば打つほど感染するとの事ですが、コロナワクチンの有効性の研究でアウトカムが”any infection”である数百以上のオミクロン期の観察研究のほとんどで有効性が正です。これらは臨床試験のような厳密なデザインではないですが画像の様な主張は現在でも無数の研究結果と整合性がありません(以下WHOのサマリー https://view-hub.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/COVID19%20VE%20Studies_Forest%20Plots_Omicron.pdf
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857306006826652109
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1857347972570456211
- noteId - 1857347972570456211
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731661239174
- tweetId - 1857306006826652109
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- ワクチンの効果が疑わしいとの事ですが、ワクチンの効果は下記にWHOにまとめられたようにオミクロン期の数百もの研究で確認されてきた知見です https://view-hub.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/COVID19%20VE%20Studies_Forest%20Plots_Omicron.pdf 打てば打つほど感染するとの事ですが、コロナワクチンの有効性の研究でアウトカムが”any infection”である数百以上のオミクロン期の観察研究のほとんどで有効性が正です。これらは臨床試験のような厳密なデザインではないですが画像の様な主張は現在でも無数の研究結果と整合性がありません(以下WHOのサマリー https://view-hub.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/COVID19%20VE%20Studies_Forest%20Plots_Omicron.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-15 09:23:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 09:05:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 08:56:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 08:50:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 08:05:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 07:25:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 06:14:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 05:24:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:58:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:42:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:32:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:31:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:26:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:08:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:00:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 03:49:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-17 06:00:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 22:05:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 07:57:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 07:02:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 05:51:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 05:50:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 05:44:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:44:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:41:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:41:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 20:52:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 06:47:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 06:23:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 06:11:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 05:10:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 05:00:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 04:40:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 03:48:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-15 03:15:20 -0600 | Rating Details |