Birdwatch Note
2024-11-14 19:20:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
OP is criticizing the screenshotted post, note belongs on the original, not the critique.
Written by 5F3E12B4593FC44DC250FE54005E37B4C0729940DFA8373461D8F4A603B10889
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857064409765421258
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1857141598393659663
- noteId - 1857141598393659663
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5F3E12B4593FC44DC250FE54005E37B4C0729940DFA8373461D8F4A603B10889 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731612035736
- tweetId - 1857064409765421258
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- OP is criticizing the screenshotted post, note belongs on the original, not the critique.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-14 13:38:22 -0600 | Rating Details |