Birdwatch Note
2024-11-14 06:18:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - seriously?
Written by DBCB4374994D26D6CCCAB6E6EBB7A92D22C87CC1D8CE135F8A7E70A3CA3D0E75
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856575010162221166
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856944856238874775
- noteId - 1856944856238874775
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DBCB4374994D26D6CCCAB6E6EBB7A92D22C87CC1D8CE135F8A7E70A3CA3D0E75 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731565128751
- tweetId - 1856575010162221166
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - seriously?
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-11-14 01:49:23 -0600 | Rating Details |