Birdwatch Note
2024-11-14 02:47:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
what evidence of collusion do you have and why is it not included in your note? thats speculation, quote tweeting a tweet and making a joke isnt enough justifiable evidence for a note.
Written by F3F9D155479A7F610126A90D158FE4D93FE97431F2E7799D83E5842605E2D0F8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856412121942372466
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856891769205788823
- noteId - 1856891769205788823
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F3F9D155479A7F610126A90D158FE4D93FE97431F2E7799D83E5842605E2D0F8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731552471816
- tweetId - 1856412121942372466
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- what evidence of collusion do you have and why is it not included in your note? thats speculation, quote tweeting a tweet and making a joke isnt enough justifiable evidence for a note.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-13 22:45:09 -0600 | Rating Details |